
The 95 Reeses. Picture credit to r/dankchristianmemes. They're phenomenal.
I. The church will change its theology to meet its economic needs.
You can read the Bible and get anything you want out of it and it's been appropriated in such a manner ever since it was being passed around its early reading communities. It isn't going to change now a few thousand years removed from those early communities. If the church didn't primarily meet its economic needs from tithing and charity then maybe this grievance of mine wouldn't exist (I doubt it but run with the idea for a second). How do you think the church pays for its liabilities? If your answer is anything other than "I pay for them" then you need to fix that because it's plain wrong. Your tithes cover the church's operating costs. It makes the church a communal success and a communal failure if its congregants don't fund it, our money goes where our values go. Except people are people and perversely insist on being people at all times. We're petty, selfish, insecure, unstable, and think much too highly of ourselves. And our cash flows reflect our fears. People will get up and go church shopping to a church that "preaches the gospel". All churches preach the gospel. It may not preach the gospel you like but they all preach the gospel. They take their money with them. Pastors, being dependent on tithes and charity from the congregation to pay for salaries and cover church operating expenses and liabilities, will preach comfortable messages to keep wallets in the seats. And sometimes they get a bit on edge in the message, like the one time the pastor will say "damn" in a message and may go "Yeah I said it! I'll say it again!" and suddenly people like him "telling it like it is" (and it's usually a "him" in this case, no disrespect meant to the female ministers in the church of course, as my mother is one). This is why I'm convinced that churches have become LGBT tolerant. Not accepting. Tolerant. Why? Because that's where the money goes. Preach a message of diversity and being inclusive because it brings in more people that are seeking that message and then work the following messages to get their money. I have a hunch this is why a lot of the aging denominations seem to be moving towards accepting these sorts of people into their churches. The UMC is famous, or infamous depending on your angle, for "accepting" LGBT members. PCUSA made the move to allow same-sex marriages and now they have a waiting list to leave the denomination that lasts years. It belies the point that these churches, heavy with an aging demographic, are seeking for ways to extend their economic life cycles. They still have expenses and they'll find ways to read scripture differently to bring more people in, something that will continue to be done until the end of time.
Now I'm not against different readings of the Bible. That should be obvious by now. Read the Bible differently for the objectively right reasons. Not to seek more money to cover church expenses.
Also. This tithing thing. 10% is the floor, not the ceiling. You give that base amount and then give more. To missions hopefully. Those people need it.
II. The Biblical authors would've hated each other.
Paul hated Peter. Matthew and John would've hated Paul. Luke disagreed with Paul. Genesis and Isaiah would've disagreed with each other. Ecclesiastes doesn't care about any of the books around it. Job throws all our ideas of God out the window (when was the last time you listened to a sermon on Job or Ezekiel or Jeremiah or Numbers or Revelation?). And the disconnect is a feature, not a bug. Matthew and John are the most Jewish gospels ("I came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it"-Mathew 5:17-18, which is only said in Matthew by the way, John pegs Jesus into Jewish philosophy with John 1 echoing Philo, and John claiming Jesus to be the Jewish messiah they've long awaited). Paul says we don't need this legal Judaism anymore because Christ came and gave us the system of grace that we're currently under, overhauling the system that Paul was taught. Paul identifies as a Pharisee after all. Luke sees the baptism of Jesus as a pneumatological event, Paul sees the baptism of Jesus as a Christological event. Genesis talks of God as corporeal, walking through Eden, having a voice that Adam and Eve can understand, having human emotions that are easily expressed and readily understood. Isaiah encounters God as something completely other, the temple being filled with His robe, and Isaiah freaking out (Paul Tillich opened his courses on religion with Isaiah 6, the moment here being his idea of what religion really encompasses). These clear disconnects are supposed to be there. Luke traveled with Paul and still disagreed with him on areas of doctrine. Why? Luke is his own person and can disagree with Paul. Maybe he thought Paul talked out of his ass sometimes. All Christians do. These moments of disagreement matter. Don't ignore them. The Bible has contradictions in them. What do you expect from a book that is filled with writings that span centuries, life-worlds, perspectives, and authors that probably had zero clue any other book was being written? Much less that their own writings would survive for thousands of years after their death? The "contradictions", the disconnects, the clashing personalities in the Bible and implicit interbiblical disagreements, are all supposed to be there. Don't tame or undermine them.
III. Babylon Bee isn't that good.
It's The Onion but with conservative Christian elements. I never found The Onion all that funny to start. My sense of humor lies somewhere between George Carlin, Tom Segura, and Fool House Productions (look them up). When they're funny they're funny but nine times our of ten it's hit and miss. Satire is meant to be subversive so I expected a bit more from a site like theirs. But I will admit their article "Larry-Boy confirmed for Avengers: Infinity War" had me laughing pretty hard.



